Longest sequences of XKs and E-Types
Just as a curiousity, here are the longest contiguous car number sequences of XK and E-Types on the site.
Right-Hand Drive E-Types:
RHD Series 1 OTS: 850007 – 850038: 32 cars
RHD Series 1 FHC: 860001 – 860013: 13 cars
RHD Series 1 2+2: 1E50182 – 1E50184: 3 cars
RHD Series 1.5 OTS: 1E1887 – 1E1889: 3 cars
RHD Series 1.5 FHC: 1E21706 – 1E21709: 4 cars
RHD Series 1.5 2+2: 1E50994 – 1E50995: 2 cars
RHD Series 2 OTS: 1R1008 – 1R1010: 3 cars
RHD Series 2 FHC: 1R20912 – 1R20914: 3 cars
RHD Series 2 2+2: 1R35031 – 1R35032: 2 cars
RHD Series 3 OTS: 1S2565 – 1S2568: 4 cars
RHD Series 3 2+2: 1S51708 – 1S51711: 4 cars
Right-Hand Drive XKs:
RHD XK120 OTS: 660040 – 660045: 6 cars
RHD XK120 FHC: 669091 – 669095: 5 cars
RHD XK120 DHC: 667237 – 667244: 8 cars
RHD XK140 OTS: 800052 – 800055: 4 cars
RHD XK140 FHC: 804501 – 804504: 4 cars
RHD XK140 DHC: 807008 – 807010: 3 cars
RHD XK150 OTS: 820053 – 820056: 4 cars
RHD XK150 FHC: 824103 – 824107: 5 cars
RHD XK150 DHC: 827094 – 827097: 4 cars
Left-Hand Drive E-Types:
LHD Series 1 OTS: 875001 – 875032: 32 cars
LHD Series 1 FHC: 885001 – 885010: 10 cars
LHD Series 1 2+2: 1E77232 – 1E77235: 4 cars
LHD Series 1.5 OTS: 1E17817 – 1E17820: 4 cars
LHD Series 1.5 FHC: 1E34708 – 1E34710: 3 cars
LHD Series 1.5 2+2: 1E77946 – 1E77948: 3 cars
LHD Series 2 OTS: 1R14206 – 1R14209: 4 cars
LHD Series 2 FHC: 1R26730 – 1R26733: 4 cars
LHD Series 2 2+2: 1R43438 – 1R43443: 6 cars
LHD Series 3 OTS: 1S20049 – 1S20053: 5 cars
LHD Series 3 2+2: 1S70506 – 1S70509– 4 cars
Left-Hand Drive XKs:
LHD XK120 OTS: 670025 – 670029: 5 cars
LHD XK120 FHC: 679010 – 679012: 3 cars
LHD XK120 DHC: 677133 – 677136: 4 cars
LHD XK140 OTS: 810678 – 810680: 3 cars
LHD XK140 FHC: 814307 – 814308: 2 cars
LHD XK140 DHC: 817575 – 817578: 4 cars
LHD XK150 OTS: 831248 – 831251: 4 cars
LHD XK150 FHC: 836625 – 836628: 4 cars
LHD XK150 DHC: 837874 – 837876: 3 cars
Am I missing something ? Left hand drive E-types. No mention of Series 1 OTS 4.2 Litre ? Starting Serial number 1E10001 ?
Regards,
Chris Sas
Comment by Chris Sas — February 15, 2010 @ 5:07 pm
I get it now, having read the fine print !!
Sorry for my error !
Regards,
Chris Sas
Comment by Chris Sas — February 15, 2010 @ 5:12 pm