Comments on: Series 1 and a Bit http://xkedata.com/blog/2007/08/31/series-1-and-a-bit/ Latest News on the Data Sites Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:54:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: roger http://xkedata.com/blog/2007/08/31/series-1-and-a-bit/#comment-955 roger Mon, 28 Jan 2008 10:26:14 +0000 http://xkedata.com/blog/2007/08/31/series-1-and-a-bit/#comment-955 Hi John, there is a field now where you have to answer the question before it will accept the comment. It's right above the form and hopefully once read the answer is obvious. Hi John, there is a field now where you have to answer the question before it will accept the comment. It’s right above the form and hopefully once read the answer is obvious.

]]> By: John http://xkedata.com/blog/2007/08/31/series-1-and-a-bit/#comment-943 John Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:54:33 +0000 http://xkedata.com/blog/2007/08/31/series-1-and-a-bit/#comment-943 Roger, keep trying to leave following comment on XK-e forum, "Re 1E 12687 your car was originally Primrose (Yellow) built on 24th Feb 1966. regards John." Keeps saying its spam? please let me know what I'm doing wrong, regards John. Roger, keep trying to leave following comment on XK-e forum, “Re 1E 12687 your car was originally Primrose (Yellow) built on 24th Feb 1966. regards John.” Keeps saying its spam? please let me know what I’m doing wrong, regards John.

]]> By: Tony Bailey http://xkedata.com/blog/2007/08/31/series-1-and-a-bit/#comment-719 Tony Bailey Fri, 12 Oct 2007 09:37:45 +0000 http://xkedata.com/blog/2007/08/31/series-1-and-a-bit/#comment-719 Roger Had this from Paul Skilleter after I mailed him the comments: Tony - Yes, 'my' figures of 20 or more years ago were outdated a long time ago and were somewhat abitrary anyway. Mark Miller in California did some good work a while back in established the true change points, and I am sure others have looked into the matter further. We even have an article on the stocks about '1.5' E-types; maybe we should revive it in the light of more recent research. The JCNA are very sound on this sort of thing. Cheers, Paul Roger

Had this from Paul Skilleter after I mailed him the comments:

Tony -

Yes, ‘my’ figures of 20 or more years ago were outdated a long time ago and
were somewhat abitrary anyway. Mark Miller in California did some good work a
while back in established the true change points, and I am sure others have
looked into the matter further. We even have an article on the stocks about
‘1.5′ E-types; maybe we should revive it in the light of more recent
research. The JCNA are very sound on this sort of thing.

Cheers,

Paul

]]>